Australian PrehistoryHistory - AustralianAustralian CultureAustralian SportAustralian IdentityAustralian animals

Homepage

Share |

Blue-tongue
A true-blue battler

Box Jelly fish
The torment

Crocodile
A living dinosaur

Dingo
Unfairly judged?

Echidna
A hardy survivor

Emu
A curious wanderer

Flies
The unsung hero

Funnelweb
Watch the ugg boots

Kangaroo
I don't know

Koala
Just sitting

Platypus
An Australian joke!

Sharks
Be not afraid

Snakes
Eyes for the silly

Tasmanian Devil
Biting back

Tasmanian Tiger
A sad tale

Quolls
Needs a syllable

Wombat
Keg of muscle

Yowie
The missing link?

Native pets

 

 

Blog it!

 

Tasmanian Devil
Tasmanian Devil


The marsupial bites back

"We'd be able to achieve two goals - separating the devils from the cancer, and restoring the ecological balance on the mainland. Devils prey on fox cubs and compete with adult foxes for food." Chris Johnson, an ecologist at James Cook University.

At a height of just 30cm, the Tasmanian Devil is the world's largest carnivorous marsupial. It was once common on the mainland, but was probably hunted to extinction by humans around 500 years ago.

The Devil is not a particularly agile animal, and so finds it difficult to hunt live prey. As it is primarily a carrion feeder, it has evolved a good sense of smell to sniff out dead or dying animals, and powerful jaws to chase off any other predator already eating the animal. A 10kg animal can exert the same biting pressure of a 40kg dog. Once it has gained control of the dead animal, in a matter of hours, the Devil can consume up to a third of its body weight.

The characteristics of the devil have made it the perfect defender of the Tasmanian ecosystem. Since European colonisation, mainland Australia has lost 50 per cent of its marsupial species. Tasmania, however, has only lost one species of marsupial - the Tasmanian Tiger. The preservation of Tasmania's marsupials has been attributed to the Tasmanian Devil preventing foxes from ever being able to gain a foothold. The fox was first introduced to Tasmania in 1864 but it didn't take hold. Signs of continued deliberate or accidental introduction were again seen in 1972 when a fox was caught in a rabbit trap. More signs were seen in 1998 when a fox stowed away in a container from Melbourne. Despite all the trade and all the deliberate attempts at introduction, fox populations always died out.

The fox probably died out because it one of the few animals that Devils can easily kill. Fox dens are very smelly, and quickly sniffed out by the Devils. Even if the mother fox is at the den to protect her young, she is no match for the Devil. Paleontologist Stephen Wroe has analysed how they would go in a one-on-one battle and found:

"In one-to-one situations, our results suggest that the devil would easily prevail and even give dingoes [wild dogs] a run for their money."

Native animals have pouches so do not need to fear the Devil, and might well have evolved pouches because of the Devil. As a consequence, Devils probably know that following a fox scent leads to a far more bountiful meal than the following the scent of any native animal.

Although Devils have kept foxes out of Tasmanian completely, they have not been able to keep out cats. This is probably because cats can make dens in trees where their kittens are safe from the Devil. Nevertheless, cat populations are much lower in Tasmania than the mainland, and this is probably as a result of Devil populations chasing them off their kills. Over million of years, Devils evolved a keen sense of smell and a feeding style that involved following the trails of Quolls in the hope that a Quoll would kill and animal, and could then be chased off their kills. With cats occupying a similar niche to quolls, Devils have simply changed the scents they follow.

As well helping the environment by attacking foxes and cats, Devils help farmers by maintaining hygiene. Any dead livestock is quickly consumed thus reducing the threat of blowfly strike. On the downside, Devils have been known to steal lambs and chickens.

Some scientists, such as Professor Chris Johnson, have advocated reintroducing the Devil to mainland in order to do make life difficult for Cats and Foxes there. His proposal has since been backed by

Some opponents have argued that it would be too risky because the Devil might hunt native fauna as well. In terms of ideology, probably the concern is that native animals get conceived as weak and evolutionary stunted creatures that need to be protected by humans. For example, in 1923, Albert Le Souef, curator of Taronga Park Zoo, wrote:

"when animals of this class (marsupials) suddenly find themselves placed in competition with such advanced forms as the Fox, the Cat, and the Rabbit - types far ahead of them on the evolutionary scale - it is ...inevitable that they should go down before the invader."

Le Souef’s attitude still prevails today, and many people find it difficult to conceive of an Australian ecosystem which is better off when they are not presiding over it.

Blogs - Should the Tasmanian Devil return to the mainland?

Activity 1 – Reintroduce the Devil

Professor Chris Johnson has advocated reintroducing the Devil to mainland Australia as a way of dealing with the threat of Foxes and Cats. Sarah Hartwell seemed to be a critic of the plan and wrote:

 "In 1995, the wildlife issue became more urgent with a rabbit calcivirus outbreak causing predators in previously rabbit-infested areas to turn more and more to native animals. New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service stepped up the use of poison bait (not trapping and destruction) to kill foxes, feral cats and dogs, but at the same time, some scientists spoke of reintroducing the Tasmanian Devil into mainland Australia in the hope that it will prey on fox cubs, kittens etc. It was not stated how Tasmanian Devils would be trained to kill only introduced species and not kill native species. Many would question the wisdom of (re)introducing any predator likely to prey on already "decimated" fauna."

  1. The Devil’s body shape gives a good indication about why it is primarily a scavenger (a greyhound it is not.) What decimated mainland fauna would it prey on?
  2. For Hartwell, an unanswered question was how Devils could be trained to only kill introduced species. Could Devils be trained? Would they need to be trained?
  3. The idea of training a wild animal to selectively not kill when it will be re-released into the wild is an absurdity. Could you suggest any reasons why Hartwell may have included such an extreme absurdity in your argument?
  4. Can you think of any people that would suffer financially if the Devil was released on the mainland and did an effective job at controlling Cats and Foxes?
  5. Hartwell uses the words that “many would question..”. Why might this phrase be more persuasive than “I would question…”

 

Rebalancing Australia's ecology?
Wednesday, 03 October 2007
By Chris Johnson

 

Activity 2 - Icon

Below are examples of the image of Devil being used in popular culture. For each example, try to speculate what the designers/selectors were hoping to achieve by using the image of the Devil.  

1) The Tasmanian Devil is the symbol of the Tasmanian National Parks and Wildlife Service.

2) The Tasmanian VFL team is known as the Devils.

3) The Devil features on the 1994 Gold $200

4) Taz is a Looney Tunes character that crazily eats everything

5) Actor Errol Flynn was known as the Tasmanian Devil. His biography was "My Wicked Wicked Ways." He also said that he portrayed himself as wicked in the hope that he would not be regarded as wicked.

Activity 3 - Industry

Below are methods that allow some people to make money out of the Devils. How do you think working in each industry would affect attitudes to the Devils?

1) Zoos - Devils are occasionally sold to zoos. 

2) Eco-tourism - Some eco-tourist operators take tourists on small safaris to watch Devils feeding. 

3) Pets - Although it is illegal to keep Devils as pets, some people have won their confidence with kindness. They have even put them on a leash and taken them for a walk.

If the law was ever changed, Devils would make great family pets. As an added bonus, native animals, rather than Cats, would benefit from cohabitation with humans.

4) Pest controllers - Currently, there is a significant mainland industry built around poisoning Cats and Foxes. Not only is the industry extremely cruel, it is also ineffective due to the vacuum effect. Once the Foxes and Cats are eliminated from an area, more simply migrate it. Breeding Devils as pest controllers will one day be a far more effective industry. It overcomes the vacuum effect, and is also less cruel to Foxes and Cats.

5) Research - The Devils are suffering a contagious cancer that is decimating populations. Funding is available to study the cancer.

Landscapes

Outback

The Coast

Great Dividing Range

Highlands

Antarctica

Rainforest

 

Environmental problems

Climate Change