
The Dingo
Unfairly
judged?
"On the evidence,
juries have always convicted the dingo, but it is a largely circumstantial case,"
Dr Stephen Wroe
Although
the Dingo does not feature on the Australian currency, on any state emblems or
as the moniker of any major sporting teams, a high profile court case gave evidence
of its latent popularity. On August 17, 1980, Lindy Chamberlain, the wife
of a Church minister, told authorities that a Dingo took her baby Azaria from their campsite near Uluru. Curiously,
the Australian public was more inclined to place faith in the character of a wild
dog than in a minister's wife. Popular t-shirts of the time displayed the slogan
"the Dingo is innocent." Ms Chamberlain was initially convicted of murder but some years later her conviction
was quashed. Even so, some Australians are adamant that the Dingo was not guilty.
Although many Australians are convinced that a Dingo could not kill a baby, they are more likely to believe it caused the mainland extinction of the Tylacine and Devil. Again; however, there are some significant reasons to doubt the Dingo's guilt. Specifically, after arriving in Australia between 3,000 and 10,000 years ago, it evolved in a way that more closely resembled the Thylacine. In other words, it evolved to more closely resemble the animal it is thought to have replaced, which doesn't seem to indicate it had a great comparative adavantage. Firstly, although the Dingo
sometimes hunts in pairs or small family groups, like the Tiger, Dingos are not
by nature a pack dog. Secondly, the solitary life seemed to have reduced its need to communicate
for like the Tiger, it can't bark. Thidly, like the Tiger, when hunting alone, it relies
on endurance to wear down its prey.
Considering
its evolutions have taken it closer to the Tiger, and the Tiger had 4 million
years to adapt to the Australian environment, it is somewhat of a mystery as to
how it managed to eliminate the Tiger in such a short period of time. The Tylacine was a superior reproducer that was better adapted to the cyclic nature
of Australian droughts. It was also stronger. If there was a fight over food, the Tiger would win. Early
colonist had noted the Tiger's ferocity to dogs and its ability to quickly kill
them.
Perhaps the Dingo's only real advantage was aits symbolic relationship with the Aborigines. Together, Aborigines and Dingo became a super-predator
that the Tiger just couldn't compete with. (See Tasmanian Tiger.)
As
well as causing the mainland extinction of the Tiger, the Dingo is also thought
to be responsible for the mainland extinction of the Tasmanian Devil. Such a theory also seems flawed when one considers that even though Tasmanian Devils
now have wild dogs to contend with, its population numbers have held up well until decimated by a facial cancer. Furthermore, a 10kg devil can exert
a biting pressure of a dog twice the size of a Dingo. These jaws would have made
any Dingo wary about an attack.
Perhaps
then, just as it has been unfairly judged for causing the extinction of the Devil,
the Dingo may also be unfairly judged for causing the extinction of the Tiger.
The Dingo itself is now also facing extinction,
not from a predator or competition but from being bred out of existence. As more
and more pet dogs are escaping to the wild, the Dingo's purity is progressively
being diluted.
Dingo
and Thylacine comparison
| |
Dingo |
Thylacine |
| Height
|
50cm |
58
cm |
| Length |
117-124
cm |
180 cm |
| Weight |
10-20kg |
15-30
kg |
| Reproduction |
- 4-5
puppies
- Once a year
- Gestation-
63 days
|
- 2-4
puppies
- Continous breeding
- Puppies
in pouch for three months
|
| Hunting
behaviour |
Largely solitary
but sometimes hunts in small groups |
Largely
solitary but might have hunted in pairs |
| Prey |
Carrion,
lizards, small mammals |
Kangaroos,
Devils, small marsupials, perhaps Dingos |
| Relationship
with humans |
- Semi-domesticated
- Symbiotic
- Hunting
partner
- Companion
- Wild
- Pest
- Competitor
for food
|
- Wild
- Competitor
for food
- Pest
|
Dingo may save Australian wildlife
Wednesday, 11 July 2007
Icon
Industry
1)
Breeding - In many areas of Australia the Dingo
is still considered vermin and cannot legally be kept. A few states treat the
Dingo like any other dog and they can be sold as pets.
As
a pet, the Dingo requires more maintenance than a normal dog. Obedience training
is a necessity but harsh corrective measures will result in undesirable traits.
Eliminating the call of
the wild also seems an impossibility. Unlike a dog which can be trained to feel
a tie to an area that it will defend, the Dingo, if it gets the chance, will escape
to go walkabout.
2) Eradication -
A lucrative industry exists for shooting, trapping or baiting the Dingos that
threaten livestock.
3)
Maintenance of the Dingo Fence -
A huge fence has been constructed to prevent Dingos from entering pasture. In
Queensland it stretches for 2500km, in New South Wales for 584km and in South
Australia for 2225km. In all, it is well
over twice the length of the Great Wall of China. Maintenance of the Dingo Fence costs around $1 million a year.
