Australian paintings

Redfining the landscape and identity

Arguably, Australia, more than any other nation, shows the power of art to hasten or represent social change and define social meanings. While Australia has not produced a Cezzane that has shown a new way conceiving a bowl or fruit, or a Picasso that created a new art style that revolutionised an attitude to painting, it has produced countless artists who have used art to change the way their country is thought of. The most influential paintings have revolved around the harsh nature of the landscape as a way to personify positive or negative viewpoints upon the people that interact with it.

The value of tradition

The intention of the first Australian artists is somewhat of a mystery. In North Australia, the relics of their work could be legitimately described as one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. Known as the Bradshaws, the art is dispersed in around 100 000 sites spread over 50 000 sq. km of northern Australia. Because they are so old, they have become part of the rock itself, which makes carbon dating to find the exact age impossible. Although the art's pigment can't be dated, a fossilised wasp nest covering one of the paintings has been dated at 17,000 + years old. This makes the art at least four times older than the pyramids of Egypt. A perculiar feature of the art is that they show people with tassels, hair adornments, and possibly clothing. Such body adornments are usually only found in agricultural societies that have developed hierarchical systems of status; however, agricultural societies are not believed to have originated until 10,000 years ago and never in Australia.

Arrernte painting for public corroboree - 1901

While the art of the Bradshaw people survived for tens of thousands of years, the art of the people at the time of European colonisation was usually more ephemeral. Typically painted on sand or on the body, the whole tribe was the canvas, and there was little separation between artists and art consumer. The visual representations were combined with song and dance to weave history, mythology and the geography of the land into a whole that is greater than the sum of the individual parts. They may have given directions to a billabong, an account of an historical encounter with another tribe or depicted a mythical man turning into a kookaburra during the dreamtime. Such paintings offered value to hunters, people on walkabout as well as the storytellers entrusted to communicate the essence of the tribe's identity and the individual's place within it. They also made each individual feel that they were of the landscape, the environment and a community.

When European artists arrived in the 18th century, they brought with them the traditions of the "old" world. The likes of Eugéne von Guérard and Nicholas Chevalier tended to paint what they saw and the value of the work was principally in its aesthetics qualities. Like most artists, they strove for a sense of uniqueness and they tried to find it by painting the Australian land. Despite being technically skilled, most of their early paintings neither captured the look nor the feeling of the Australian landscape. The Australian land is messy and random. The trees are twisted with the chaotic look of an old lady's broken fingers. The bark hangs like a poor child wearing the well-used hand-me-downs of an older sibling. The earth is littered with leaves and old branches. Furthermore, because the topsoil is thin, it reveals the immense history of the earth; its faults, its fossils, its bones and its sediment. The colours are dull and contrast is slight; however, with this dullness, comes great complexity of colour. These unique characteristics were not conveyed in the European's paintings. Instead, the paintings looked and felt more like the French Alps or the rolling hills of Ireland. The Europeans used deep colours of monotone green that made Australia seem new and fertile. They used deep blues in conjunction with white to create feelings of contrast. Some artists even tried to further emphasise the uniqueness with a few naked Aborigines include for token value. Unfortunately, they made Aborigines look more like black Romans who forgot to put on their tunics.

One artist who did manage to attain a sense of regional definition was Convict artist W.B Gould. Rather than find his uniqueness in the land, Gould found it in the people. His painting "The landlord" offers an insight into the origins of Australia's larrikin personality. It depicts a suited man with a toothless grin. Strict convention amongst noble man of the time was a deadpan expression; especially if one's teeth were missing. Without doubt, Gould had painted an ex-Convict whose desire to conform to social prestige had been surpassed by a self-effacing personality. By painting a man with a toothless grin, not only was Gould changing portraiture, he was also redefining those values associated with success.

W.B Gould
The Landlord

Towards the beginnings of the 20th century, a cultural tradition was developing and led to the creation of the Heidleburg School. Together, a group of painters dealt with a common subject matter, learnt from each other, yet produced completely individualistic results. The likes of Tom Roberts, and Arthur Streeton captured the chaos and complexity of the land and wove into it the prevailing themes of nationalism and independence. Their paintings convey optimism with hill top gazes filled with vibrant blues and subtle yellows. Their subject matter included the pioneers whom were pushing the bush frontiers.

With an optimistic subject matter and an aesthetic that matched the complexity of the landscape, the artists of the Heidleburg School were able to position the bush landscape as the personification of the uniqueness and strength of the Australian character.

 

Also painting the pioneers was Frederick McCubbin; however, unlike Roberts and Streeton, McCubbin's themes tended to be melancholic. McCubbin painted thick bushland where light was dim and the environment seemed somewhat lonely and dark. Into the scene he would introduce a pioneer but rather than optimistically showing the pioneer conquering nature, McCubbin showed them being conquered themselves or using the bush as their refuge. In other words, no sooner had a nationalism based on mastering the bush been created, it was being subverted by another artist with a different take.

Whereas the pre-war years had been dominated by artists from the Heildleburg School, the post-war years saw a group of artists from outside of the art schools take over. The chief group among these were the Angry Penguins, which included the notable names of John Perceval, Arthur Boyd, Sidney Nolan, Albert Tucker, and Charles Blackman. The Angry Penguins felt that Australian art and Australia itself was far too restrictive and their aim was to modernise it with the psychological power of surrealism and expressionism.

Albert Tucker’s works were the most disturbing of the groups. Tucker painted decaying carcasses of animals killed in a drought. Yet even in death the animals do not find peace; they loom large at the beholder as if they are the mutant remains of the apocalypse. In addition, Tucker depicted the darker side humanity - showing fear, trauma, anxiety and struggle. It was this disturbance that in turn laid the groundwork for new forms of thinking and awareness.

 

 

While Tucker was the most psychologically confronting, Sidney Nolan was arguably the most influential. Nolan became obsessed with myths; the most notable being the legendary bushranger Ned Kelly. Nolan painted Ned as a comic book character, a magician, a leader and a martyr. He blended into Ned images of the landscape and even titled the paintings with newspaper commentary. Whether Kelly was a good man or bad was always ambiguous, and therefore contributed to the intrigue in his work.

Although it was not Nolan's intention to turn Ned Kelly into an icon, that was the consequence of his work. Before Nolan, Ned Kelly had his supporters, but was relatively ignored. After Nolan, the Kelly helmet became one of the most replicated symbols of Australia and Kelly himself immortalised as an Australian legend. It was an outcome that did not please everyone. Frank Devine of the Australian newspaper wrote in 2000:

"It was a continuing shock to watch somebody with a name like Nolan more or less validating Nedophilia with a series of paintings of the wretched horse thief and cop killer."

Sidney Nolan
The Trial

Along with the Angry Penguins, another self-taught artist, Russell Drysdale, started redefining the frontiers of society. Drysdale's work is interesting to contrast to the optimism of previous pioneering artists. His paintings depict towns that had been the pioneering dream but were now laying desolate as the frontier shrank back into nothingness. They depict dilapidated iron structures that seem so fleeting in comparison to the eternity of the landscape and the native animals that have inhabited it since time immemorial.

If appreciated in a historical context, Drysdale's works were not mere depictions of the outback; they recorded Australians changing their attitude towards their identity. Rather than depicting the bush as the place of opportunity, Drysdale's works record of a time when Australians began seeing the bush as a place of broken dreams and hence, began to look elsewhere for their heroes.

 

Russell Drysdale
Man Reading a Paper

Russell Drysdale
Emus in the Landscape

Ironically, while the market was accepting Drysdale’s vision of a dying outback, it also started accepting visions by Aboriginal artists that positioned the outback as a landscape of immense spirituality. The most notable style was the dot painting, which was invented in the 1970s when a white school teacher north of Alice Springs, Geoffrey Bardon, encouraged Aboriginal children to use acrylics to paint a mural using traditional body and sand painting techniques of their culture. The new style quickly spread amongst Aborigines in the region and produced great names like Clifford Possum and Anatjari Tjakamarra. Dot painting then spread Australia wide.

Is dot painting modern art? Discuss

Clifford Possum
Bushfire Dreaming

Pro Hart was another outback audience that found an eager audience in the cities with a return to an optimistic vision of the outback landscape. Instead of depicting the outback as a wasteland, Hart depicted it as a place of environmental and cultural beauty. Hart painted miners who were not dependant upon farming for their survival and who had therefore been spared the destructive influence of droughts. Because Hart did not see the outback as a place of broken dreams, he was able to convey the beauty of blue skies, parched land and gum trees. He painted people happily walking their dogs, and egalitarian bars open to the outback air and all those who wanted to join.

In addition to taking a positive view to the landscape and culture around him, Hart was differentiated by his paintings of insects. Few non-Indigenous artists ever paint insects as they tend to be intimidating and ugly creatures. Hart, on the other hand, saw insects as objects as beauty.

Although Hart had a profound influence on Australia, it was on his outback home of Broken Hill where the change was the most pronounced. When he started his career, Broken Hill was a hard-drinking mining town. By the end, pubs had been converted to art galleries and a town of only 30,000 people was supporting up to 100 professional and semi-professional artists as well as over 30 private galleries.

Although most Australian art has used the outback as a surce of inspiration, it is an environmental subject matter that most Australians have little familiarity with. 84 per cent of Australians live in a coastal catchment and their only experience with the outback comes via movies or paintings.

Not all Australian artists have used to help an outback to help an Australian audience understand a subject matter they have no experience with. Brett Whiteley is one artists that used the urban landscape as his muse, and his art definately deals with subject matters that coastal residents do have experience with. Influenced by heroin, Whiteley's art seems to give a view on a world where nothing is certain.

Albert Tucker
Apocalyptic Horse

 

Activity 3 – Cultural response

Activity purpose – Understand how ideologies and prejudices can shape the response to art.

Pro Hart and Brett Whiteley were both prone to paint caricatured landscapes that were intellectually hollow; however, Hart was ridiculed by many urban art figures while Whiteley was celebrated. For example, Barry Pearce, head curator of Australian Art at the Art Gallery of NSW, said comparing Hart with the artists who normally hang in the gallery was

"rather like Slim Dusty being compared to Mozart."

Likewsie, Alan Dodge, Director of Art Gallery of Western Australia, said of Hart,

"He is one of the most delightful illustrators of the Australian folk idiom, but let's not use the word art anywhere."

Contrast the two paintings below and come up with suggestions for the different audience responses.

 

Pro Hart - Dunnies

Brett Whitely - The Olgas